● head-to-head — two names, metric by metric

AAPL vs MSFT

A real, side-by-side comparison across relative strength, alpha, beta, dividend yield, net margin and revenue growth. A winner is marked per row only when both names have a real value and the metric has a direction — beta is shown neutral, and a side with no real value is "—", never a fabricated 0.

AAPLvsMSFTAAPL leads 5 · MSFT leads 3
MetricAAPLMSFTWinner
Relative strength vs SPY RS+19.33-11.80AAPL
Annualized alpha %/yr+3.87%-18.84%AAPL
Market beta β1.080.88
Forward dividend yield %+0.32%+0.93%MSFT
Net margin (latest FY) %+26.90%+36.10%MSFT
Revenue growth YoY (latest FY) %+6.40%+14.90%MSFT
Price vs 50-day MA %+10.27%-1.92%AAPL
% off 52-week high %-0.50%-29.23%AAPL
Days to cover (short) d1.731.47
Max drawdown (2y) %-33.43%-34.91%AAPL
52-week range percentile %ile98.8021.30

Real metrics from market + fundamentals data: relative strength & alpha vs SPY, market beta (neutral magnitude), forward dividend yield, latest-FY net margin and revenue growth, and price vs the 50-day MA. Winner marked only when both names have a real value on a directional metric; "—" means one side has no real value (never a fabricated 0). 11 of 11 metrics comparable. Your decisions, your risk.